ABSTRACT. Background: We devised a consistent approach to instituting and advancing enteral nutrition among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients
Developing consistent approaches to various practices and procedures in neonatology has been suggested as a means of improving outcomes.1-3 As an example, the Vermont Oxford Network “Got Milk” focus group developed guidelines for enterai nutrition that were tested by Kuzma-O’Reilly et al3 and found to improve nutrient intake and growth, with a reduced length of stay and reduced costs. As part of an overall effort to improve outcomes, we used a multidisciplinary consensus development process to devise a consistent approach to enteral nutrition of low-birthweight infants. The multidisciplinary group produced a set of feeding guidelines for neonates
Details of the feeding guidelines are posted on the Intermountain Healthcare website. Briefly, the guidelines give specific instructions to the bedside nurses, according to the birth weight of the patient, categorized as
We analyzed data from all patients
The day of birth was termed “day of life 0,” and the day beginning 1 minute after their first midnight was termed “day of life 1.” The time to reach 80 mL/k/d was selected as a significant outcome because of an IHC systemwide program to reduce line-associated infections in the NICU, calling for consideration of removing central catheters when 80 mL/k/d of enterai intake is reached.4 PN was defined as an amino-acid-containing, multivitamin-containing, IV solution ordered on the IHC “PN program” and prepared by the hospital pharmacy PN team.
Descriptive statistics were calculated using Stata 8.3 (College Station, TX). Between-group means were tested using independent-sample t- tests when parametric assumptions were met, with Wilcoxon ranksum tests used for nonparametric comparisons. Proportions were compared between groups using ?^sup 2^ tests with Yate’s continuity correction or, when expected counts were small, Fisher’s exact test. Between-group variances were tested using independent-samples standard deviation F tests. For demographic features, two-tailed tests were used. Otherwise, one-tailed tests were conducted. For all tests, ? was set at .05.
RESULTS
In period 1, 301 patients were admitted to the NICU, of which 58 (19.3%) weighed
Of the 58 patients admitted to the NICU in period 1, 2 died; a 700-g male infant (23 weeks’ gestation) who died on day O, and a 720-g female infant (26 weeks) who died after 6 weeks. The first of these was not considered in the feeding and growth calculations (Table III), because no feedings were given, but the second was included because that patient survived for 37 days and received enterai feedings. Of the 68 patients in period 2, 2 died; a 657-g male patient (23 wks) and a 990-g female patient (24 weeks). Both died on day of life 1. Neither received any enterai feedings, and neither was included in the feeding-outcome data (Table III).
In periods 1 and 2, the median days to first milk feedings was 1. However, the variability (range, 0-24 days in period 1 vs 0-6 days in period 2) was far less in period 2 (p
DISCUSSION
During the 6-month period after implementing feeding guidelines, we observed fewer NPO days and fewer days where PN was used. Although these improvements were statistically significant, they were relatively minor improvements compared with those observed by Kuzma-O’Reilly et al3 after they implemented feeding guidelines. They found that adopting feeding guidelines greatly reduced the initial NPO days, improved nutrient intake and growth, and reduced the length of hospital stay. Perhaps one reason we failed to see such marked improvements was that our baseline rates were quite different than theirs. For instance, implementing their guidelines was associated with a reduction in days to start enterai feedings from day of life 8.9 before guidelines to day 4.7 after. In contrast, before instituting guidelines our enterai feeding was begun on (median) day of life 1. Similarly, before guidelines were instituted their neonates required 19 days to achieve an enterai intake of 80 kcal/k/d, and this fell to 6.5 days after. In contrast, before guidelines our neonates required only 7 days to reach an enterai intake of 100 kcal/k/d. Thus, our patients already had very early initiation of feedings and quite rapid escalation of feedings, even before the guidelines were adopted.
Although the magnitude of our improvements, after adopting written feeding guidelines, was not as great as those of Kuzma-O’Reilly et al,3 our trends were similar. Perhaps if we had a much larger sample size, the reduction in NPO days and days to achieve various feeding milestones would have been more impressive. However, the fact that we observed less variability in all feeding-related outcomes measured suggests that adopting guidelines can produce benefits even among NICUs that have already instituted early enterai nutrition and relatively rapid feeding escalation practices.