Answering your questions on anthrax stains, ergonomic workstations, glucose urine testing on children, site preparation for infant blood cultures, and contaminated urine cultures - Tips from the clinical experts
Categories: Child Care and Health TipsAnthrax stains
Q What is the best microscopy method for observing anthrax spores? Do the spores fluoresce under ultraviolet light?
A The spores of Bacillus anthracis do not fluoresce under ultraviolet light, but can be visualized by phase contrast microscopy or after staining with a spore stain. Most routine clinical laboratories (Level A) should not attempt to examine environmental samples (unknown powders suspected of containing anthrax spores) because the potential for aerosolization of the material is so great.
Your institution should have an emergency plan for handling reports of suspicious powders. If an emergency plan is not in place, contact your state health laboratory for assistance. However, if the suspected material is examined, the procedure must be performed in a Biological Safety Level 3 containment facility. (1) The suspected material can be suspended in saline or water and used to prepare a wet mount. Seal the edges of the wet mount, decontaminate the slide with bleach, and view under phase contrast microscopy. (2) The spores should be phase bright and regular in shape and size. A spore stain may be used, but often the suspected powder does not adhere to the slide.
Director of Microbiology
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Portland, OR
References
(1.) Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 4th ed. Washington, D.C. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. CDC-NIH; 1999.
(2.) Logan. NA and PCB Turnbull. Bacillus and recently derived genera, pp. 357-369, in Manual of Clinical Microbiology, eds. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC and RH Yolken. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 1999.
Ergonomic workstation
Q I read your article on lab ergo nomics (MLO Feb. 2001, page
with great interest. I wonder if you have a contact who would address the problem of using the microscope, counting on a computer keyboard, and viewing the results on a monitor. There seems to be no satisfactory way to form an ergonomically correct workstation to perform all these tasks. Most of the attainable information is related to secretarial stations, lifting, and pipetting, with little attention to the MT who spends eight hours a day at the scope and the computer.